top of page
Search

Illiteracy Not a Reason to Avoid Enforcing Agreement to Arbitrate


Claimant Armando Hernandez argued that his agreement to arbitrate was procedurally unconscionable because Spanish is his primary language, he can barely read and write in English, and he suffers from myopia, which affects his reading ability.  He also stated that no one explained the agreement or receipt and acknowledgment form to him, despite the HR person being aware of his “substantial limitations”.


While acknowledging that one court found an arbitration agreement to be procedurally unconscionable in cases involving illiteracy, the district court judge cited other authorities.  It has long been recognized under Texas law that “illiteracy or language barriers … will not relieve a party of the consequences of his contract”, and thus ordered the matter to arbitration.


Armando Hernandez v. Five Managers, Inc. et al., Civil Action 4:23-CV-04592 (August 27, 2024)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Nonsignatory Compels Arbitrtion

Arbitration agreements are typically understood to bind only the parties who sign them. However, a recent case, Ford v ConocoPhillips ,...

 
 
 
NFL Arbitration Denied Enforcement

On August 14, 2025, a significant decision was handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of Flores v....

 
 
 

Comments


Contact
Information

214-747-2012

Mailing Address: 3883 Les Lacs Ave, Addison, Texas 75001

Office address: 14555 Dallas Pkwy Ste 100, Dallas, Texas 75254

©2023 by Daniel Tenant. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page