top of page
Search

Illiteracy Not a Reason to Avoid Enforcing Agreement to Arbitrate


Claimant Armando Hernandez argued that his agreement to arbitrate was procedurally unconscionable because Spanish is his primary language, he can barely read and write in English, and he suffers from myopia, which affects his reading ability.  He also stated that no one explained the agreement or receipt and acknowledgment form to him, despite the HR person being aware of his “substantial limitations”.


While acknowledging that one court found an arbitration agreement to be procedurally unconscionable in cases involving illiteracy, the district court judge cited other authorities.  It has long been recognized under Texas law that “illiteracy or language barriers … will not relieve a party of the consequences of his contract”, and thus ordered the matter to arbitration.


Armando Hernandez v. Five Managers, Inc. et al., Civil Action 4:23-CV-04592 (August 27, 2024)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Final Leg Local Drivers Avoid Arbitration

In a major, unanimous ruling the Supreme Court firmly rejected a restrictive "cross-or-tag" rule for the Federal Arbitration Act's transportation worker exemption, holding that local drivers on the fi

 
 
 
Award Vacated. Arbitrator Exceeded Powers

The Federal Arbitration Act provides that an award should only be vacated where “arbitrators exceed their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subj

 
 
 
Infinite Arbitration

“Infinite arbitration” pushes the scope of arbitration to a breaking point. These provisions attempt to bind consumers or employees to arbitrate any dispute, with a wide scope of entities, forever, of

 
 
 

Comments


Contact
Information

214-747-2012

Mailing Address: 3883 Les Lacs Ave, Addison, Texas 75001

Office address: 14555 Dallas Pkwy Ste 100, Dallas, Texas 75254

©2023 by Daniel Tenant. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page